Time lapse? Cancel The title field is required!

1. Melvin Waldron

   

   43 posts
   
   9/25/2013 3:09 PM

   I know the spell check is now working great, well except when I have a long-winded post.
   
   Is there a way to extend the time from lapsing before getting timed out and then the spell check not working?
   
   (I know there are many relieved at the thought of less long-winded posts, but hey if Peach isn't going to post anymore, someone has to be long winded?)
   
   Thanks
   
   Mel

   
   Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO
   
   
2. Verheek John

   
   9/26/2013 2:09 PM

   Mel,
   
   I am going to attempt to reproduce this on my end, but would like some clarification before I go down the wrong path. Is the issue your experiencing when attempting to spell check a lengthy post or is it when attempting to submit the post?
   
   Thank you,

   
   
   
   
3. Melvin Waldron

   

   43 posts
   
   9/26/2013 2:09 PM

   John Verheek said: Mel, I am going to attempt to reproduce this on my end, but would like some clarification before I go down the wrong path. Is the issue your experiencing when attempting to spell check a lengthy post or is it when attempting to submit the post? Thank you,

   
   
   John, it is when I spell check a lengthy post. When I get the error or time-lapse, what I have then done is copy and past the post into a word document (as per someone from South Florida would prefer me to do) to correct any spelling issues and then paste it back into the post, which I can then preview and post. It's all spell checking a long winded or (thoughtful) post.
   
   Thanks,
   
   Mel

   
   Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO
   
   
4. Verheek John

   
   9/30/2013 11:09 AM

   Thank you Mel, I can see the problem you have encountered. Unfortunately the issue is not a lapse in time, but in the length of the message itself. It seems as though the spell check service in place as a max-length on the amount of text it will accept.
   
   I am not sure how to best handle this yet, but I will research this further to determine a solution that best works within the limitation and will keep this thread updated.

   
   
   
   
5. Melvin Waldron

   

   43 posts
   
   9/30/2013 1:09 PM

   John Verheek said: Thank you Mel, I can see the problem you have encountered. Unfortunately the issue is not a lapse in time, but in the length of the message itself. It seems as though the spell check service in place as a max-length on the amount of text it will accept.
   
   I am not sure how to best handle this yet, but I will research this further to determine a solution that best works within the limitation and will keep this thread updated.

   
   
   Thanks for figuring that out for us, I belive it should be called the Peach effect after the only person who is more long-winded than myself.
   
   Thanks!
   
   Mel

   
   Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO